| Title |
On dividing justly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Choice and Welfare, May 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00297056 |
| Authors |
M. E. Yaari, M. Bar-Hillel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 37% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 27% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 21% |
| Psychology | 9 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,881,159
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#43
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#516
of 8,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them