↓ Skip to main content

DNA fingerprinting: application to conservation of the CITES-listed dragon fish, Scleropages formosus (Osteoglossidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Aquarium Sciences and Conservation, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
DNA fingerprinting: application to conservation of the CITES-listed dragon fish, Scleropages formosus (Osteoglossidae)
Published in
Aquarium Sciences and Conservation, June 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1018387601905
Authors

A.A. Fernando, L.C. Lim, K. Jeyaseelan, S.W. Teng, M.C. Liang, C.K. Yeo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Master 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 46%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Aquarium Sciences and Conservation
#5
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,449
of 29,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquarium Sciences and Conservation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them