| Title |
Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychometrika, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7 |
| Authors |
Richard E. Zinbarg, William Revelle, Iftah Yovel, Wen Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 696 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 1% |
| Unknown | 650 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 19% |
| Researcher | 96 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 89 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 55 | 8% |
| Other | 156 | 22% |
| Unknown | 113 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 258 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 79 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 39 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 4% |
| Engineering | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 132 | 19% |
| Unknown | 144 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,996,390
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Psychometrika
#52
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,495
of 59,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychometrika
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them