↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of rheumatic fever: Current status of Jones criteria and role of echocardiography

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of rheumatic fever: Current status of Jones criteria and role of echocardiography
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, April 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02758174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Saxena

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#279
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,905
of 39,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them