↓ Skip to main content

Ectomycorrhizal fungi with edible fruiting bodies 2.Boletus edulis

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Ectomycorrhizal fungi with edible fruiting bodies 2.Boletus edulis
Published in
Economic Botany, January 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf02861294
Authors

I. R. Hall, A. J. E. Lyon, Y. Wang, L. Sinclair

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 48%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Chemistry 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#272
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,479
of 93,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them