↓ Skip to main content

Growth of cultured seahorses (Hippocampus abdominalis) in relation to feed ration

Overview of attention for article published in Aquaculture International, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Growth of cultured seahorses (Hippocampus abdominalis) in relation to feed ration
Published in
Aquaculture International, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10499-004-3100-7
Authors

Chris M.C. Woods

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 4%
Malaysia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 71%
Environmental Science 8 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 4 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Aquaculture International
#76
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,164
of 56,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquaculture International
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them