↓ Skip to main content

Potential for Bias in MMPI-2 Assessments Using the Fake Bad Scale (FBS)

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Injury and Law, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Potential for Bias in MMPI-2 Assessments Using the Fake Bad Scale (FBS)
Published in
Psychological Injury and Law, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12207-007-9002-z
Authors

James N. Butcher, Carlton S. Gass, Edward Cumella, Zina Kally, Carolyn L. Williams

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 63%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2011.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Injury and Law
#88
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,361
of 79,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Injury and Law
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them