↓ Skip to main content

Towards multi-phase postmortem CT angiography in children: a study on a porcine model

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Towards multi-phase postmortem CT angiography in children: a study on a porcine model
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00414-018-1783-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Z. Mokrane, L. Dercle, O. Meyrignac, É. Crubézy, H. Rousseau, N. Telmon, F. Dedouit

Abstract

Multi-phase postmortem computed tomography angiography (MPMCTA) is a growing technique, which is standardized for adults. Application of this protocol for a children population is not so well defined. Our study aims to adapt the adult's protocol to children, using a porcine model. Three groups of 18 pigs were studied, with a weight distribution between 4 and 48 kg. Different pump devices were used. Pigs of group I were studied using the Virtangio® machine, whereas pigs of groups II and III were studied using used the Medrad® machine. Study of vascular opacification was possible using a semi-quantitative method based on 26 arterial and 26 venous segments that were distributed over the entire body from the cephalic extremity to the posterior pawns. While thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic vascular opacification were complete for each individual pig in a group, group III showed better vascular opacification for the cephalic extremity. This was also true for anterior and posterior pawns vascular opacification. Spearman correlation tests showed a significant relationship between anthropometric characteristics of pigs, injection parameters, and percentage of opacified segments. A higher percentage of opacification was obtained for individuals of lower weights, with comparatively lower quantities of contrast agent injected. Postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) was possible for all the individuals, particularly for small weights (4 kg) using the Medrad® machine. However, further studies are needed to better understand the procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,489,831
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#973
of 2,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,642
of 440,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#29
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.