↓ Skip to main content

Roles of Different Types of Excretions in Mediated Communication by Scent Marks of the Common Palm Civet, Paradoxurus hermaphroditus Pallas, 1777 (Mammalia, Carnivora)

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Bulletin, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 250)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Roles of Different Types of Excretions in Mediated Communication by Scent Marks of the Common Palm Civet, Paradoxurus hermaphroditus Pallas, 1777 (Mammalia, Carnivora)
Published in
Biology Bulletin, November 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:bibu.0000007715.24555.ed
Authors

V. V. Rozhnov, Yu. V. Rozhnov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 17%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 42%
Researcher 3 25%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 67%
Environmental Science 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biology Bulletin
#38
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,195
of 57,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Bulletin
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them