↓ Skip to main content

SIRT6 inhibitors with salicylate-like structure show immunosuppressive and chemosensitizing effects

Overview of attention for article published in Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SIRT6 inhibitors with salicylate-like structure show immunosuppressive and chemosensitizing effects
Published in
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.09.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrizia Damonte, Giovanna Sociali, Marco Daniele Parenti, Debora Soncini, Inga Bauer, Silvia Boero, Alessia Grozio, Maria von Holtey, Francesco Piacente, Pamela Becherini, Roberta Sanguineti, Annalisa Salis, Gianluca Damonte, Michele Cea, Maximilien Murone, Alessandro Poggi, Alessio Nencioni, Alberto Del Rio, Santina Bruzzone

Abstract

The NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase SIRT6 is an emerging cancer drug target, whose inhibition sensitizes cancer cells to chemo-radiotherapy and has pro-differentiating effects. Here we report on the identification of novel SIRT6 inhibitors with a salicylate-based structure. The new SIRT6 inhibitors show improved potency and specificity compared to the hit inhibitor identified in an in silico compound screen. As predicted based on SIRT6 biological roles, the new leads increase histone 3 lysine 9 acetylation and glucose uptake in cultured cells, while blocking TNF-α production and T lymphocyte proliferation. Notably, the new SIRT6 inhibitors effectively sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine. Finally, studies of compound fingerprinting and pharmacokinetics defined the drug-like properties of one of the new SIRT6 inhibitors, potentially allowing for subsequent in vivo proof-of-concept studies. In conclusion, new SIRT6 inhibitors with a salicylate-like structure were identified, which are active in cells and could potentially find applications in disease conditions, including cancer and immune-mediated disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 27%
Chemistry 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
#6,708
of 7,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,701
of 325,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
#62
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.