You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subarmachius, Bacurius, and the Schola Scutariorum Sagittariorum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Classical Philology, October 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1086/367528 |
| Authors |
David Woods |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 80% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,544,865
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Classical Philology
#31
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,610
of 28,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Classical Philology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them