↓ Skip to main content

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Spider Toxin (Argiotoxin-636) Analogs as NMDA Receptor Antagonists

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Spider Toxin (Argiotoxin-636) Analogs as NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, January 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1011988317683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott T. Moe, Daryl L. Smith, Yongwei (Eric) Chien, Joanna L. Raszkiewicz, Linda D. Artman, Alan L. Mueller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,134
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,753
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.