| Title |
Neurochemical and behavioral differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, December 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-002-1288-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James R. Shoblock, Eric B. Sullivan, Isabelle M. Maisonneuve, Stanley D. Glick |
| Abstract |
Methamphetamine (METH) and amphetamine (AMPH) are both abused psychostimulants. Although METH is generally accepted to be more addictive and potent than its analogue AMPH, there are no known neurobiological differences in action between the two drugs that may account for such differences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 15 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Psychology | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,959
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,790
of 136,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.