↓ Skip to main content

Eculizumab induces long-term remission in recurrent post-transplant HUS associated with C3 gene mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Eculizumab induces long-term remission in recurrent post-transplant HUS associated with C3 gene mutation
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00467-010-1708-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samhar I. Al-Akash, P. Stephen Almond, Van H. Savell, Salam I. Gharaybeh, Cris Hogue

Abstract

A 15-year-old male patient developed atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) at 16 months of age leading to end-stage renal disease. The family history was suggestive of autosomal dominant aHUS, and he was more recently found to have a C3 heterozygous gene mutation (1835C>T mutation in exon 14, which determines the amino-acidic substitution R570W) with no other complement abnormalities. He had two renal transplants, the first at 2.5 years, and the second at 8 years of age, but allograft dysfunction developed in both transplants leading to graft failure due to recurrent HUS at 5 years and 18 months post-transplantation respectively. At 15 years of age he received a third transplant from a deceased donor with pre-emptive plasmapheresis. He had immediate graft function and nadir serum creatinine was 1.3-1.4 mg/dl. Severe allograft dysfunction and hypertension developed 2 months after transplantation following influenza infection. Renal allograft biopsy showed thrombotic microangiopathy. He received plasmapheresis followed by eculizumab therapy. Allograft function returned to baseline 3 weeks after starting therapy, and post-treatment allograft biopsies showed improvement in thrombotic microangiopathy. He continues to receive eculizumab every 2 weeks with stable graft function 13 months after transplantation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Other 12 16%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Librarian 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 59%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,973
of 4,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,842
of 197,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.