Title |
Biosensors and biochips: advances in biological and medical diagnostics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry, March 2000
|
DOI | 10.1007/s002160051549 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
T. Vo-Dinh, B. Cullum |
Abstract |
In the past two decades, the biological and medical fields have seen great advances in the development of biosensors and biochips capable of characterizing and quantifying biomolecules. This review is meant to provide an overview of the various types of biosensors and biochips that have been developed for biological and medical applications, along with significant advances over the last several years in these technologies. It also attempts to describe various classification schemes that can be used for categorizing the different biosensors and provide relevant examples of these classification schemes from recent literature. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | <1% |
India | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Russia | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 1% |
Unknown | 528 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 139 | 25% |
Student > Master | 82 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 69 | 12% |
Researcher | 57 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
Other | 83 | 15% |
Unknown | 93 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 113 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 17% |
Chemistry | 69 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 8% |
Materials Science | 38 | 7% |
Other | 89 | 16% |
Unknown | 110 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,870,748
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry
#4
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,767
of 41,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.