You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): Executive Summary A Collaborative Report From the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alan T. Hirsch, Ziv J. Haskal, Norman R. Hertzer, Curtis W. Bakal, Mark A. Creager, Jonathan L. Halperin, Loren F. Hiratzka, William R.C. Murphy, Jeffrey W. Olin, Jules B. Puschett, Kenneth A. Rosenfield, David Sacks, James C. Stanley, Lloyd M. Taylor, Christopher J. White, John White, Rodney A. White, Elliott M. Antman, Sidney C. Smith, Cynthia D. Adams, Jeffrey L. Anderson, David P. Faxon, Valentin Fuster, Raymond J. Gibbons, Jonathan L. Halperin, Loren F. Hiratzka, Sharon A. Hunt, Alice K. Jacobs, Rick Nishimura, Joseph P. Ornato, Richard L. Page, Barbara Riegel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 391 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 70 | 17% |
| Other | 54 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 8% |
| Other | 133 | 32% |
| Unknown | 49 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 270 | 64% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 66 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,525,205
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,517
of 16,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,735
of 92,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#4
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.