↓ Skip to main content

Functional ecology of growth in seedlings versus root sprouts of Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Functional ecology of growth in seedlings versus root sprouts of Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.
Published in
Trees, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00468-012-0781-9
Authors

Emad Farahat, Martin J. Lechowicz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 34%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 66%
Environmental Science 7 22%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#111
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,821
of 173,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them