↓ Skip to main content

新WHO分類に採用されるNIFTP,WDT-UMPについて

Overview of attention for article published in Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 134)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
新WHO分類に採用されるNIFTP,WDT-UMPについて
Published in
Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, July 2017
DOI 10.11226/jaesjsts.34.2_76
Authors

近藤 哲夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#50
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,308
of 326,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.