↓ Skip to main content

Going Gluten Free: the History and Nutritional Implications of Today’s Most Popular Diet

Overview of attention for article published in Current Gastroenterology Reports, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 368)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Going Gluten Free: the History and Nutritional Implications of Today’s Most Popular Diet
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11894-017-0597-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn Newberry, Lindsay McKnight, Menaka Sarav, Octavia Pickett-Blakely

Abstract

The gluten-free diet (GFD) has become one of the most popular diets in modern history. Claims of improved health and increased energy fuel this popularity, though there is little evidence to substantiate these claims. The present review focuses on outlining known gluten-related disorders (GRD), discussing the GFD in the general population, exploring nutritional considerations, and providing advice for physicians in managing these patients. Currently, about a quarter of the population reports keeping a GFD despite GRDs affecting less than half of these individuals. Reduced intake of calcium, B vitamins, and fiber as well as enhanced consumption of fat and simple carbohydrates has consistently been reported and needs to be continually addressed. Although a necessity in proper management of GRDs, unforeseen nutritional complications may develop in patients who are gluten free for which enhanced physician awareness is vital to achieving optimal patient care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 21%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 49 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 56 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#892,007
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#8
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,312
of 328,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them