↓ Skip to main content

Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
750 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00231461
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. -P. Deiber, R. E. Passingham, J. G. Colebatch, K. J. Friston, P. D. Nixon, R. S. J. Frackowiak

Abstract

Regional cerebral blood flow was measured in normal subjects with positron emission tomography (PET) while they performed five different motor tasks. In all tasks they had to moved a joystick on hearing a tone. In the control task they always pushed it forwards (fixed condition), and in four other experimental tasks the subjects had to select between four possible directions of movement. These four tasks differed in the basis for movement selection. A comparison was made between the regional blood flow for the four tasks involving movement selection and the fixed condition in which no selection was required. When selection of a movement was made, significant increases in regional cerebral blood flow were found in the premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and superior parietal association cortex. A comparison was also made between the blood flow maps generated when subjects performed tasks based on internal or external cues. In the tasks with internal cues the subjects could prepare their movement before the trigger stimulus, whereas in the tasks with external cues they could not. There was greater activation in the supplementary motor cortex for the tasks with internal cues. Finally a comparison was made between each of the selection conditions and the fixed condition; the greatest and most widespread changes in regional activity were generated by the task on which the subjects themselves made a random selection between the four movements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 4 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 235 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 31 12%
Professor 29 11%
Student > Master 17 7%
Other 57 22%
Unknown 25 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 22%
Neuroscience 51 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 15%
Sports and Recreations 11 4%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 35 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,731,384
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#307
of 3,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,825
of 18,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them