| Title |
Rate and Risk Factors Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-018-3472-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enrico Danzer, Casey Hoffman, Jo Ann D’Agostino, Judith S. Miller, Lindsay N. Waqar, Marsha Gerdes, Judy C. Bernbaum, Hannah Rosenthal, Natalie E. Rintoul, Lisa M. Herkert, William H. Peranteau, Alan W. Flake, N. Scott Adzick, Holly L. Hedrick |
| Abstract |
To determine the rate and predictors of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Between 06/2004 and 09/2015 a total of 110 CDH survivors underwent neurodevelopmental (ND) testing and screening for ASD, followed by a full autism diagnostic evaluation if indicated at our institution. We found a 9 time higher rate of ASD in CDH children compared to the general population (P = 0.0002). Multiple patient-related and clinical variables risk factors of ASD were identified by univariate analysis. However, only short-term and long-term neurodevelopmental delays were strongly associated with ASD in CDH by multivariate comparisons. There is a striking prevalence of ASD in CDH survivors and our findings suggest that all CDH children should be regularly screened for ASD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,270,694
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,980
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,395
of 451,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#45
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.