↓ Skip to main content

An fMRI study of musicians with focal dystonia during tapping tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
An fMRI study of musicians with focal dystonia during tapping tasks
Published in
Journal of Neurology, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00415-010-5468-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Kadota, Yasoichi Nakajima, Makoto Miyazaki, Hirofumi Sekiguchi, Yutaka Kohno, Masatoshi Amako, Hiroshi Arino, Koichi Nemoto, Naotaka Sakai

Abstract

Musician's dystonia is a type of task specific dystonia for which the pathophysiology is not clear. In this study, we performed functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the motor-related brain activity associated with musician's dystonia. We compared brain activities measured from subjects with focal hand dystonia and normal (control) musicians during right-hand, left-hand, and both-hands tapping tasks. We found activations in the thalamus and the basal ganglia during the tapping tasks in the control group but not in the dystonia group. For both groups, we detected significant activations in the contralateral sensorimotor areas, including the premotor area and cerebellum, during each tapping task. Moreover, direct comparison between the dystonia and control groups showed that the dystonia group had greater activity in the ipsilateral premotor area during the right-hand tapping task and less activity in the left cerebellum during the both-hands tapping task. Thus, the dystonic musicians showed irregular activation patterns in the motor-association system. We suggest that irregular neural activity patterns in dystonic subjects reflect dystonic neural malfunction and consequent compensatory activity to maintain appropriate voluntary movements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 37%
Neuroscience 10 13%
Psychology 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,425,960
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#181
of 4,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,904
of 166,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.