Title |
Laparoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-005-0435-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. Q. Nguyen, C. M. Divino, J.-L. Wang, S. H. Dikman |
Abstract |
Surgery remains the standard for nonmetastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Laparoscopic surgery should be considered for these tumors as their biologic behavior lends them to curative resection without requiring large margins or extensive lymphadenectomies. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 21% |
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 62% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,647,369
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,719
of 6,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,736
of 71,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.