↓ Skip to main content

Laboratory information management systems in the work of the analytic laboratory

Overview of attention for article published in Measurement Techniques, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 244)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Laboratory information management systems in the work of the analytic laboratory
Published in
Measurement Techniques, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11018-011-9638-7
Authors

D. O. Skobelev, T. M. Zaytseva, A. D. Kozlov, V. L. Perepelitsa, A. S. Makarova

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 48 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 11%
Engineering 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Chemistry 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 56 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Measurement Techniques
#45
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,776
of 181,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Measurement Techniques
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them