↓ Skip to main content

Mate selection, consortship formation, and reproductive tactics in adult female savanna baboons

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, October 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Mate selection, consortship formation, and reproductive tactics in adult female savanna baboons
Published in
Primates, October 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02381935
Authors

Fred B. Bercovitch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 60%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Psychology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,731,211
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#477
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,010
of 17,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.