↓ Skip to main content

Direct and Indirect Effects of Tides on Ecosystem‐Scale CO2 Exchange in a Brackish Tidal Marsh in Northern California

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct and Indirect Effects of Tides on Ecosystem‐Scale CO2 Exchange in a Brackish Tidal Marsh in Northern California
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, March 2018
DOI 10.1002/2017jg004048
Authors

S. H. Knox, L. Windham‐Myers, F. Anderson, C. Sturtevant, B. Bergamaschi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,283,318
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#1,108
of 1,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,555
of 349,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#42
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.