↓ Skip to main content

Oviposition stimulants for the black swallowtail butterfly: Identification of electrophysiologically active compounds in carrot volatiles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, May 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Oviposition stimulants for the black swallowtail butterfly: Identification of electrophysiologically active compounds in carrot volatiles
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, May 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00992528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Baur, Paul Feeny, Erich Städler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Professor 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 79%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#636
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,887
of 20,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.