↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Behaviors of Non-gay Identified Non-disclosing Men Who Have Sex with Men and Women

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Behaviors of Non-gay Identified Non-disclosing Men Who Have Sex with Men and Women
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10508-008-9357-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karolynn Siegel, Eric W. Schrimshaw, Helen-Maria Lekas, Jeffrey T. Parsons

Abstract

The sexual behaviors of non-gay identified men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) who do not disclose their same-sex behavior to their female partners (referred to by some as men "on the down low") were examined, including the potential for these men to serve as a "bisexual bridge" for HIV and STD acquisition and transmission. Self-reported sexual behavior data were collected as part of an exploratory study of an ethnically diverse (41% African American, 35% Latino, 22% White, and 2% Asian) sample of 46 non-gay identified, non-disclosing MSMW in New York City. Men reported significantly more male than female sexual partners, but more frequent sex with females. The prevalence and frequency of unprotected sex did not differ significantly between male and female partners in the past 3 months. Men reported risk behavior more often with steady female and steady male partners (e.g., wives, girlfriends, boyfriends) than with more casual male and female partners (regular uncommitted partners, one-night stands). Men, especially African American/Black men, were significantly less likely to report receptive sexual behaviors with men than insertive behaviors. Unprotected sex was common with male and female partners in the past 3 months (e.g., 35% of anal sex with men; 50% of vaginal sex). Indeed, 22% of the sample (38% of those who had both recent males and female partners) reported both unprotected vaginal sex and unprotected anal sex with a male partner during the past 3 months. Although the study was limited by a small convenience sample, the findings suggest that non-gay identified non-disclosing MSMW are at risk for the acquisition and transmission of HIV and STDs, and may serve as a potential bridge, suggesting the need for further research and intervention targeting this unique population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 14%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 30%
Social Sciences 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,127
of 3,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,782
of 83,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.