↓ Skip to main content

Sex, sex-ratios, and the dynamics of pelagic copepod populations

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Sex, sex-ratios, and the dynamics of pelagic copepod populations
Published in
Oecologia, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00442-005-0346-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Kiørboe

Abstract

I examine how the population biology of pelagic copepods depends on their mating biology using field data and a simple demographic model. Among calanoid copepods, two distinct patterns emerge. First, copepods that lack seminal receptacle and require repeated mating to stay fertilized have near equal adult sex ratios in field populations. Winter population densities are orders of magnitude less than the critical population density required for population persistence, but populations survive winter seasons as resting eggs in the sediment. Population growth in these species is potentially high because they have on average a factor of 2 higher egg production rates than other pelagic copepods. Second, other copepods require only one mating to stay fertile, and populations of these species have strongly female-skewed adult sex-ratios in field populations. Resting eggs have not been described within this group. Winter population sizes are well predicted by the critical density required for population persistence which, in turn, is closely related to the body-size-dependent mate-search capacity. Thus, the different requirements for mating lead in the first case to a more opportunistic reproductive strategy that implies rapid colonization of the pelagic during productive seasons, and in the second case to a strategy that allows maintenance of a pelagic populations during unproductive seasons. Positive density dependent population growth during periods of low population density ('Allee effect') amplifies population density variation during winter into the subsequent summer, thus explaining why summer densities appear to depend more on winter densities than on current growth opportunities in pelagic copepods.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Denmark 2 2%
Latvia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 110 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 49%
Environmental Science 28 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,673
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,750
of 155,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.