↓ Skip to main content

Indian Science for Indian Tigers?: Conservation Biology and the Question of Cultural Values

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Biology, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Indian Science for Indian Tigers?: Conservation Biology and the Question of Cultural Values
Published in
Journal of the History of Biology, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10739-004-1486-8
Authors

Michael Lewis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 4 4%
Brazil 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 33%
Environmental Science 27 27%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,597,150
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#182
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,500
of 57,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them