Title |
On Kakeya's problem and a similar one
|
---|---|
Published in |
Mathematische Zeitschrift, December 1928
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01171101 |
Authors |
A. S. Besicovitch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 44% |
Professor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 4 | 44% |
Computer Science | 2 | 22% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 22% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Mathematische Zeitschrift
#52
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134
of 3,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematische Zeitschrift
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.