↓ Skip to main content

Human C-peptide antagonises high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction through the nuclear factor-κB pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Human C-peptide antagonises high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction through the nuclear factor-κB pathway
Published in
Diabetologia, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00125-008-1032-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Luppi, V. Cifarelli, H. Tse, J. Piganelli, M. Trucco

Abstract

Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes is predominantly caused by hyperglycaemia leading to vascular complications through overproduction of oxidative stress and activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). Many studies have suggested that decreased circulating levels of C-peptide may play a role in diabetic vascular dysfunction. To date, the possible effects of C-peptide on endothelial cells and intracellular signalling pathways are largely unknown. We therefore investigated the effect of C-peptide on several biochemical markers of endothelial dysfunction in vitro. To gain insights into potential intracellular signalling pathways affected by C-peptide, we tested NF-kappaB activation, since it is known that inflammation, secondary to oxidative stress, is a key component of vascular complications and NF-kappaB is a redox-dependent transcription factor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,811,925
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,047
of 5,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,918
of 83,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.