You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pulsed flows, tributary inputs and food‐web structure in a highly regulated river
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13109 |
| Authors |
John L. Sabo, Melanie Caron, Rick Doucett, Kimberly L. Dibble, Albert Ruhi, Jane C. Marks, Bruce A. Hungate, Ted A. Kennedy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 35 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Energy | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,857,141
of 24,766,831 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,587
of 3,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,429
of 336,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#51
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,766,831 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.