| Title |
Optimal Dose of Running for Longevity Is More Better or Worse?∗
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duck-chul Lee, Carl J. Lavie, Rajesh Vedanthan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 18% |
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 16% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 33% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#288,421
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#655
of 16,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,426
of 362,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#12
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.