↓ Skip to main content

Fumarate metabolism and ATP production in Pseudomonas fluorescens exposed to nitrosative stress

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Fumarate metabolism and ATP production in Pseudomonas fluorescens exposed to nitrosative stress
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10482-014-0211-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Varun P. Appanna, Christopher Auger, Sean C. Thomas, Abdelwahab Omri

Abstract

Although nitrosative stress is known to severely impede the ability of living systems to generate adenosine triphosphate (ATP) via oxidative phosphorylation, there is limited information on how microorganisms fulfill their energy needs in order to survive reactive nitrogen species (RNS). In this study we demonstrate an elaborate strategy involving substrate-level phosphorylation that enables the soil microbe Pseudomonas fluorescens to synthesize ATP in a defined medium with fumarate as the sole carbon source. The enhanced activities of such enzymes as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and pyruvate phosphate dikinase coupled with the increased activities of phospho-transfer enzymes like adenylate kinase and nucleoside diphophate kinase provide an effective strategy to produce high energy nucleosides in an O2-independent manner. The alternate ATP producing machinery is fuelled by the precursors derived from fumarate with the aid of fumarase C and fumarate reductase. This metabolic reconfiguration is key to the survival of P. fluorescens and reveals potential targets against RNS-resistant organisms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 70%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#534
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,692
of 228,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.