↓ Skip to main content

Subgroups and Heterogeneity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Subgroups and Heterogeneity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Sculpher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Master 15 12%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Decision Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,373,631
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#739
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,356
of 189,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#204
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.