↓ Skip to main content

Borna disease, a possible hazard for man?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, September 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Borna disease, a possible hazard for man?
Published in
Archives of Virology, September 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01314025
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Rott, S. Herzog, K. Bechter, K. Frese

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,519,292
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#1,031
of 4,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,766
of 16,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.