↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiology of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 1,439)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Pathophysiology of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12185-009-0476-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han-Mou Tsai

Abstract

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a disorder with characteristic von Willebrand factor (VWF)-rich microthrombi affecting the arterioles and capillaries of multiple organs. The disorder frequently leads to early death unless the patients are treated with plasma exchange or infusion. Studies in the last decade have provided ample evidence to support that TTP is caused by deficiency of a plasma metalloprotease, ADAMTS13. When exposed to high shear stress in the microcirculation, VWF and platelets are prone to form aggregates. This propensity of VWF and platelet to form microvascular thrombosis is mitigated by ADAMTS13, which cleaves VWF before it is activated by shear stress to cause platelet aggregation in the circulation. Deficiency of ADAMTS13, due to autoimmune inhibitors in patients with acquired TTP and mutations of the ADAMTS13 gene in hereditary cases, leads to VWF-platelet aggregation and microvascular thrombosis of TTP. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of TTP, address the ongoing controversies, and indicate the directions of future investigations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Other 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,069,650
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#49
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,021
of 167,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them