↓ Skip to main content

Hyperbaric Therapy for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Toxicological Reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Hyperbaric Therapy for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
Published in
Toxicological Reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00139709-200524030-00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A. Henry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Toxicological Reviews
#42
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,782
of 186,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicological Reviews
#37
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.