↓ Skip to main content

集会報告 第1回 チームサイエンスの科学の日本での推進×ハテナソン

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
集会報告 第1回 チームサイエンスの科学の日本での推進×ハテナソン
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, February 2018
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.60.824
Authors

王 戈, 佐藤 賢一, 近藤 康久, 松尾 由美

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,288,083
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#202
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,660
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#15
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.