You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
この本! おすすめします 仮想通貨の仕組みと未来を読み解く5冊
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1241/johokanri.60.836 |
| Authors |
楠 正憲 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 61 | 41% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 142 | 96% |
| Scientists | 4 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#358,379
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#7
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,228
of 451,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.