↓ Skip to main content

INFOSTA維持会員限定セミナー:「特許情報データベースInnovation Q Plus新製品勉強会」参加報告

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
INFOSTA維持会員限定セミナー:「特許情報データベースInnovation Q Plus新製品勉強会」参加報告
Published in
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, February 2018
DOI 10.18919/jkg.68.2_77
Authors

鈴木 理加

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,921,538
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#313
of 1,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,156
of 451,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.