↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural Networks

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 6,368)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural Networks
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, January 2018
DOI 10.1109/tpami.2018.2799847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar Costilla-Reyes, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Patricia Scully, Krikor B. Ozanyan

Abstract

Human footsteps can provide a unique behavioural pattern for robust biometric systems. We propose spatio-temporal footstep representations from floor-only sensor data in advanced computational models for automatic biometric verification. Our models deliver an artificial intelligence capable of effectively differentiating the fine-grained variability of footsteps between legitimate users (clients) and impostor users of the biometric system. The methodology is validated in the largest to date footstep database, containing nearly 20,000 footstep signals from more than 120 users. The database is organized by considering a large cohort of impostors and a small set of clients to verify the reliability of biometric systems. We provide experimental results in 3 critical data-driven security scenarios, according to the amount of footstep data made available for model training: at airports security checkpoints (smallest training set), workspace environments (medium training set) and home environments (largest training set). We report state-of-the-art footstep recognition rates with an optimal equal false acceptance and false rejection rate of 0.7% (equal error rate), an improvement ratio of 371% from previous state-of-the-art. We perform a feature analysis of deep residual neural networks showing effective clustering of client's footstep data and provide insights of the feature learning process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 24%
Computer Science 15 19%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 33 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 516. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#49,078
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
#1
of 6,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,190
of 449,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.