↓ Skip to main content

We think you agree: The detrimental impact of the false consensus effect on behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychology, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
We think you agree: The detrimental impact of the false consensus effect on behavior
Published in
Current Psychology, December 2002
DOI 10.1007/s12144-002-1020-0
Authors

Kathleen P. Bauman, Glenn Geher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Professor 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 29%
Social Sciences 18 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#749,074
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychology
#77
of 2,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,001
of 135,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them