↓ Skip to main content

Maxillofacial trauma patient: coping with the difficult airway

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 569)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Maxillofacial trauma patient: coping with the difficult airway
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1749-7922-4-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amir A Krausz, Imad Abu el-Naaj, Michal Barak

Abstract

Establishing a secure airway in a trauma patient is one of the primary essentials of treatment. Any flaw in airway management may lead to grave morbidity and mortality. Maxillofacial trauma presents a complex problem with regard to the patient's airway. By definition, the injury compromises the patient's airway and it is, therefore, must be protected. In most cases, the patient undergoes surgery for maxillofacial trauma or for other, more severe, life-threatening injuries, and securing the airway is the first step in the introduction of general anaesthesia. In such patients, we anticipate difficult endotracheal intubation and, often, also difficult mask ventilation. In addition, the patient is usually regarded as having a "full stomach" and has not been cleared of a C-spine injury, which may complicate airway management furthermore. The time available to accomplish the task is short and the patient's condition may deteriorate rapidly. Both decision-making and performance are impaired in such circumstances. In this review, we discuss the complexity of the situation and present a treatment approach.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iraq 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,734,041
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#50
of 569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,687
of 113,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them