| Title |
Albumin infusion improves endothelial function in septic shock patients: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5075-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoffroy Hariri, Jérémie Joffre, Stephanie Deryckere, Naïke Bigé, Guillaume Dumas, Jean-Luc Baudel, Eric Maury, Bertrand Guidet, Hafid Ait-Oufella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 12% |
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Spain | 6 | 7% |
| Mexico | 5 | 6% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 66% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#672,458
of 24,242,692 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#642
of 5,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,706
of 447,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#23
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,242,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.