| Title |
Maximum static inspiratory and expiratory pressures with different lung volumes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-5-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher G Lausted, Arthur T Johnson, William H Scott, Monique M Johnson, Karen M Coyne, Derya C Coursey |
| Abstract |
Maximum pressures developed by the respiratory muscles can indicate the health of the respiratory system, help to determine maximum respiratory flow rates, and contribute to respiratory power development. Past measurements of maximum pressures have been found to be inadequate for inclusion in some exercise models involving respiration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 30 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,436,981
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#50
of 845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,556
of 68,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.