↓ Skip to main content

An Exploratory Study on the Effects of Tele-neurofeedback and Tele-biofeedback on Objective and Subjective Sleep in Patients with Primary Insomnia

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 355)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An Exploratory Study on the Effects of Tele-neurofeedback and Tele-biofeedback on Objective and Subjective Sleep in Patients with Primary Insomnia
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10484-009-9116-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha Cortoos, Elke De Valck, Martijn Arns, Marinus H. M. Breteler, Raymond Cluydts

Abstract

Insomnia is a sleeping disorder, usually studied from a behavioural perspective, with a focus on somatic and cognitive arousal. Recent studies have suggested that an impairment of information processes due to the presence of cortical hyperarousal might interfere with normal sleep onset and/or consolidation. As such, a treatment modality focussing on CNS arousal, and thus influencing information processing, might be of interest. Seventien insomnia patients were randomly assigned to either a tele-neurofeedback (n = 9) or an electromyography tele-biofeedback (n = 8) protocol. Twelve healthy controls were used to compare baseline sleep measures. A polysomnography was performed pre and post treatment. Total Sleep Time (TST), was considered as our primary outcome variable. Sleep latency decreased pre to post treatment in both groups, but a significant improvement in TST was found only after the neurofeedback (NFB) protocol. Furthermore, sleep logs at home showed an overall improvement only in the neurofeedback group, whereas the sleep logs in the lab remained the same pre to post training. Only NFB training resulted in an increase in TST. The mixed results concerning perception of sleep might be related to methodological issues, such as the different locations of the training and sleep measurements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 2%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 209 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Other 15 7%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 35%
Neuroscience 28 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Computer Science 9 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 41 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,193,656
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#28
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,315
of 95,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them