↓ Skip to main content

Canopy dieback in the upper montane rain forests of Sri Lanka

Overview of attention for article published in GeoJournal, September 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Canopy dieback in the upper montane rain forests of Sri Lanka
Published in
GeoJournal, September 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02432929
Authors

Wolfgang L. Werner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#212
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,742
of 13,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them