↓ Skip to main content

A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the Eastern United States

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, December 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the Eastern United States
Published in
Wetlands, December 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf03160750
Authors

R. Kelman Wieder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 38%
Engineering 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Chemical Engineering 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,544,865
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#226
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,498
of 58,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them